Topic summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Advocacy results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 576 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (16,658 of 22,506 topics). This Public Advocacy is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Public Advocacy
Topic details
Total words: 2,112
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos