Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Provo Canyon School results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 273 hits. Analysis detected 1,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,578 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Provo Canyon School is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Provo Canyon School
Topic details
Total words: 1,578
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 17.3%17.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos