Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Proselytization In Government results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 76% saturation with 908 hits. Analysis detected 5,742 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,194 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (180 of 16,562 topics). This Proselytization In Government is worse (more manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Proselytization In Government
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠99%Proselytization In Government (selected)22%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,194
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510098.9% percentile
21.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 76.0%76.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 63.3%63.3%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 36.1%36.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 50.8%50.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 36.6%36.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 41.7%41.7%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 32.3%32.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 32.2%32.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 27.8%27.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.4%20.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Topic 76.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 63.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 50.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 41.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 36.6%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 36.1%, sitewide 1.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 32.3%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 32.2%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 27.8%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.7%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos