Topic summary
12% 2 analyzed articles/videos 563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prompt Injection results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 570 hits . Analysis detected 4,670 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,444 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (14,454 of 16,562 topics). This Prompt Injection is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Prompt Injection
Topic details
Total words: 8,444
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst