Topic summary
⁠52%2 analyzed articles/videos1,644 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Programming Languages results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hindsight Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 894 hits. Analysis detected 6,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,600 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,804 of 16,562 topics). This Programming Languages is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Programming Languages
Topic details
Total words: 6,600
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.6%13.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.0%7.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos