Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Professional Women's Hockey League results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 370 hits. Analysis detected 1,994 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,129 of 16,562 topics). This Professional Women's Hockey League is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Professional Women's Hockey League
Topic details
Total words: 2,588
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos