Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Professional Cycling results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 299 hits. Analysis detected 1,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,846 of 16,562 topics). This Professional Cycling is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Professional Cycling
Topic details
Total words: 2,976
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.3%3.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos