Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Professional Athletes results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 824 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,424 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,052 of 16,562 topics). This Professional Athletes is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Professional Athletes
Topic details
Total words: 1,424
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos