Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pro Natalism results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,573 hits. Analysis detected 9,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,654 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,104 of 16,245 topics). This Pro Natalism is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Pro Natalism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,654
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos