Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Pro Israel Advocacy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 2,392 hits. Analysis detected 11,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,371 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Pro Israel Advocacy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Pro Israel Advocacy
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Pro Israel Advocacy (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 7,371
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.5%32.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos