Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Prison Abolition results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 954 hits. Analysis detected 5,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Prison Abolition is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Prison Abolition
Topic details
Total words: 3,640
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 26.2%26.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos