Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Prince William results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 700 faulty-reasoning hits from 561 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Prince William is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Prince William
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 561
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles561 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 30.3%30.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.8%11.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.5%15.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 30.3%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos