Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Primatology results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Halo Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 110 hits . Analysis detected 816 faulty-reasoning hits from 927 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,832 topics). This Primatology is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Primatology
Topic details
Total words: 927
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles927 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.3%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Middle Ground: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst