Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Pricing Strategy results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Self-Serving Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,855 topics). This Pricing Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Pricing Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 1,652
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.1%14.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.4%10.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos