Topic summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Transparency results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 307 hits. Analysis detected 2,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,656 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Transparency is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Presidential Transparency
Topic details
Total words: 1,824
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.8%7.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.9%10.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos