Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Speech results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 292 hits. Analysis detected 1,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,059 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Speech is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Presidential Speech
Topic details
Total words: 892
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles892 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 32.7%32.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.6%12.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.3%15.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.4%10.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.4%13.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 32.7%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos