Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video361 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Schedule results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 1,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,117 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Schedule is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Presidential Schedule
Topic details
Total words: 1,444
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.2% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 17.9%17.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.2%20.2%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.7%5.7%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.0%Red Herring: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos