Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos816 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Health results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 885 hits. Analysis detected 7,591 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,116 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (6,790 of 15,399 topics). This Presidential Health is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Presidential Health
Topic details
Total words: 5,116
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.2%12.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.3%5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos