Topic summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video1,356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Communications results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 716 hits. Analysis detected 6,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,443 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Communications is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Presidential Communications
Topic details
Total words: 4,068
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.2% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.2%15.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.2%17.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.6%17.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos