Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video478 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Aspirations results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 2,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,434 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,757 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Aspirations is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Presidential Aspirations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠90%Presidential Aspirations (selected)9%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,434
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.4% percentile
8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 23.1%23.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 23.0%23.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 16.7%16.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.9%10.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 12.2%12.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.9%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos