Topic summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video735 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Aircraft Safety results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 532 hits. Analysis detected 3,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,205 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,473 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Aircraft Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Presidential Aircraft Safety
Topic details
Total words: 2,205
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.1%24.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 16.4%16.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.3%11.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos