Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Predatory Developers results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 704 hits. Analysis detected 2,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,304 of 15,298 topics). This Predatory Developers is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Predatory Developers
Topic details
Total words: 1,732
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510078.4% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 40.6%40.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 22.4%22.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 40.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos