Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Predation results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 615 hits. Analysis detected 3,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,255 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,965 of 16,562 topics). This Predation is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Predation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,255
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.7%11.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos