Topic summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 2,015 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Practical Advice results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 633 hits . Analysis detected 4,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,045 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,437 of 16,562 topics). This Practical Advice is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Practical Advice
Topic details
Total words: 6,045
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst