Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Power Rankings results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 58.2% saturation with 1,625 hits. Analysis detected 4,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,793 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Power Rankings is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Power Rankings
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Power Rankings (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 2,793
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 58.2%58.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.4%6.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 58.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos