Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Postseason Winning Streaks results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 405 hits. Analysis detected 2,826 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,758 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,178 of 15,344 topics). This Postseason Winning Streaks is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Postseason Winning Streaks
Topic details
Total words: 1,758
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.8% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 23.0%23.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 16.5%16.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 17.2%17.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.8%14.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos