Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Posse Comitatus Act results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 726 hits. Analysis detected 4,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,001 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,761 of 16,562 topics). This Posse Comitatus Act is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Posse Comitatus Act
Topic details
Total words: 2,001
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.4% percentile
8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 27.0%27.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 15.8%15.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.2%13.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 36.3%36.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.0%15.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 22.4%22.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 36.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Straw Man: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.6%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos