Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Port Authority results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Anchoring Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 538 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,922 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (14,464 of 16,562 topics). This Port Authority is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Port Authority
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,922
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos