Topic summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pork Recipes results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 2.4% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 167 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,455 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (14,658 of 16,562 topics). This Pork Recipes is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Pork Recipes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,455
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510011.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos