Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,024 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pools results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Indoctrination, and Optimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 2.6% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 241 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (15,889 of 15,920 topics). This Pools is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Pools
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,096
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.2% percentile
0.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.6%2.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos