Topic summary
87%2 analyzed articles/videos1,154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pool Safety results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 931 hits. Analysis detected 6,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,034 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 70% (5,028 of 16,562 topics). This Pool Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Pool Safety
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,034
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.6% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 23.1%23.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.4%8.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos