Topic summary
87% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pool Safety results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 931 hits . Analysis detected 6,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,034 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 70% (5,028 of 16,562 topics). This Pool Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Pool Safety
Topic details
Total words: 4,034
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.6% percentile 4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 23.1% 23.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst