Topic summary
52% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,464 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Politics & Elections results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 889 hits . Analysis detected 8,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,677 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,266 of 15,766 topics). This Politics & Elections is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group. Politics & Elections
Topic details
Total words: 8,677
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst