Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Organizing results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 1,090 hits. Analysis detected 4,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,560 of 15,847 topics). This Political Organizing is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Political Organizing
Topic details
Total words: 2,664
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.5% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 40.9%40.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 40.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos