Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Interviews results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 1,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,552 of 16,562 topics). This Political Interviews is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Political Interviews
Topic details
Total words: 1,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.5% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Middle Ground: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos