Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Influencers results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 683 hits. Analysis detected 6,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,620 of 16,562 topics). This Political Influencers is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Political Influencers
Topic details
Total words: 4,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.5%16.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.3%10.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos