Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video976 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Health Rumors results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 1,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (14,869 of 15,801 topics). This Political Health Rumors is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
Political Health Rumors
Topic details
Total words: 3,904
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751005.9% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos