Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Enemies results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 385 hits. Analysis detected 2,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,449 of 16,562 topics). This Political Enemies is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Political Enemies
Topic details
Total words: 1,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.2% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 21.7%21.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.9%14.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.1%8.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.1%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos