Topic summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video1,140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Drama results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 850 hits. Analysis detected 4,725 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (7,614 of 22,348 topics). This Political Drama is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Political Drama
Topic details
Total words: 4,560
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.6%18.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos