Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Confrontation results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Tu Quoque, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 481 hits. Analysis detected 2,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,350 of 16,562 topics). This Political Confrontation is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Political Confrontation
Topic details
Total words: 1,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 23.4%23.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 18.8%18.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.6%30.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos