Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Communication results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 46.8% saturation with 894 hits . Analysis detected 5,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,911 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,109 of 16,509 topics). This Political Communication is worse (more manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. Political Communication
Topic details
Total words: 1,911
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.3% percentile 10.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 46.8% 46.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 40.8% 40.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 21.1% 21.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 20.3% 20.3% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 27.9% 27.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 18.2% 18.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 21.4% 21.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Topic 46.8%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 40.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 11.1% Horn Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 1.0% Begging the Question: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 0.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% No True Scotsman: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst