Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Candidates On Tv results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 340 hits. Analysis detected 3,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,482 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,297 of 16,562 topics). This Political Candidates On Tv is worse (more manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Political Candidates On Tv
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠87%Political Candidates On Tv (selected)8%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,482
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.1% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 21.9%21.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.7%18.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.2%13.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 10.9%10.9%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 8.8%8.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.5%5.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos