Topic summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Breakdown results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 614 hits . Analysis detected 3,722 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,374 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (4,015 of 15,785 topics). This Political Breakdown is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Political Breakdown
Topic details
Total words: 2,374
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.6% percentile 4.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 15.1% 15.1% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 25.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst