Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Alliances results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 49.6% saturation with 947 hits. Analysis detected 3,805 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,911 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,760 of 16,562 topics). This Political Alliances is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Political Alliances
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠90%Political Alliances (selected)9%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,911
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.4% percentile
8.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 49.6%49.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 24.3%24.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.5%16.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.0%8.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 49.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.8%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos