Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Politica Estadounidense results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 2,033 hits. Analysis detected 7,878 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,911 of 16,562 topics). This Politica Estadounidense is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Politica Estadounidense
Topic details
Total words: 5,528
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.4% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.3%26.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 36.8%36.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 36.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.1%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos