Topic summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video1,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Politica De Inmigracion results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 523 hits. Analysis detected 4,697 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,829 of 16,562 topics). This Politica De Inmigracion is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Politica De Inmigracion
Topic details
Total words: 4,140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.9% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 5.7%5.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos