Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video728 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Policy Reform results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 3,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 79% (3,564 of 16,562 topics). This Policy Reform is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Policy Reform
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,912
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.5% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 16.1%16.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.8%13.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.6%15.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.7%12.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos