Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 728 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Policy Reform results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 468 hits . Analysis detected 3,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 79% (3,564 of 16,562 topics). This Policy Reform is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Policy Reform
Topic details
Total words: 2,912
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.5% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.6% 15.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst