Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Policy Ish results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 42.3% saturation with 1,343 hits . Analysis detected 9,054 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,174 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,655 of 16,562 topics). This Policy Ish is worse (more manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Policy Ish
Topic details
Total words: 3,174
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.0% percentile 8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 42.3% 42.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 40.6% 40.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 19.4% 19.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 24.3% 24.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 13.1% 13.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 16.0% 16.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 42.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 40.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 2.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst