Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Police Recruits results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 1,181 hits. Analysis detected 4,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,758 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,918 of 16,562 topics). This Police Recruits is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Police Recruits
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,758
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.3% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 31.4%31.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.1%16.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.4%2.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 31.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos