Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Police Department Leadership results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Police Department Leadership is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Police Department Leadership
Topic details
Total words: 1,584
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.5%7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.6%6.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos