Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Police Corruption results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 1,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,699 of 16,562 topics). This Police Corruption is worse (more manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Police Corruption
Topic details
Total words: 2,084
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.0%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos